AECO’s respons to Svalbardpostens article “Swarms of high-speed Zodiacs”

The use of words such as “swarms”, “hordes” and “cattle” to describe visitors to Svalbard is starting to look like a deliberate strategy to undermine the cruise industry, and to create and reinforce a negative attitude towards this group of tourists.

Under the headline “Fearing swarms of high-speed Zodiacs”, Governor Lars Fause talks about emergency preparedness and the risk of oil spills, while Assistant Governor Sølvi Elvedahl paints a dramatic picture of cruise tourism in Svalbard as an irresponsible industry out of control, which she believes represents increased safety risk and environmental disturbance.

Sightseeing with small boats from mother vessels is presented in this context as a new and growing problem, under the caricatured title “Zodiac tourism”.

The picture lacks grounding in reality:

The regulations proposed by the Norwegian Maritime Authority are a regulation that formalizes safety in these operations. The regulations have been in place for many years, and for the past three years the industry has operated under the rules that the NMA now wants adopted.

The Governor of Svalbard and the Norwegian Environment Agency want to close as much of Svalbard as possible for shore landings from cruise ships. Now the Governor of Svalbard and the Ministry of Climate and Environment show that they also want to prevent operations at sea. The Norwegian Maritime Authority has expertise and authority on maritime safety, and the proposed regulations are safety regulations. In our view, if other authorities can stop this regulation with environmental arguments or general arguments against tourism, it is contrary to the purpose of the regulations and the NMA’s competence. It is also contrary to the general conception of law.

The Norwegian Maritime Authority has expertise and authority on maritime safety, and the proposed regulations are safety regulations. In our view, if other authorities can stop this regulation with environmental arguments or general arguments against tourism, it is contrary to the purpose of the regulations and the NMA’s competence. It is also contrary to the general conception of law.

The forthcoming parliamentary announcement must clarify whether there should be tourism and cruise tourism in Svalbard. The current lack of coherence between current policy guidelines and management is perceived as slow suffocation, and is unsustainable.

Frigg Jørgensen, Executive Director, AECO